According to OLAW, what is considered a suspension?

The definition of a suspension according to the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) aligns with the concept that a suspension is a formal and collective decision made by the IACUC as a governing body. When there is a majority vote from a convened quorum to interrupt ongoing activities, it indicates that the committee has identified concerns that need to be addressed, ensuring that animal welfare and research integrity are maintained.

This approach emphasizes the importance of procedural integrity within institutional review boards; a collective decision underscores the need for comprehensive discussion and consideration of all factors involved in research protocols. This process is designed to protect animal welfare and maintain ethical standards.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately reflect the formal process outlined by OLAW. A temporary halt initiated by any committee member does not capture the necessary cooperative decision-making process. Actions taken by the IACUC typically require formal votes and discussions, and a hold requested solely by the principal investigator lacks the procedural rigor needed for a formal suspension. As such, a majority vote of a convened quorum is crucial in upholding the integrity and authority of the IACUC's oversight.