True or False: The IACUC can extend protocol approval without a full committee review after the triennial review is due.

The statement that the IACUC can extend protocol approval without a full committee review after the triennial review is due is false because the regulations governing IACUCs mandate that a complete review and approval process must be followed when a protocol reaches its triennial review. The triennial review process requires the IACUC to evaluate the protocol's compliance with animal welfare standards, scientific validity, and any changes in regulations that may affect the study.

The necessity of a full committee review ensures that all ethical considerations and the welfare of the animals involved are thoroughly assessed. Allowing extensions without this rigorous review would contravene the ethical obligations of the IACUC and could potentially jeopardize animal welfare and research integrity. This framework is designed to maintain high standards of care and oversight in animal research, promoting adherence to regulations and protecting both animals and researchers. Thus, under standard circumstances, an extension without full review would not be permissible.