What are the recognized review methods by the USDA Animal Welfare Act and PHS Policy?

The recognition of review methods by the USDA Animal Welfare Act and PHS Policy highlights two primary types: full committee review and designated review.

Full committee review involves all members of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) convening to evaluate protocols, allowing for comprehensive discussion and input from the entire committee. This method ensures that a wide range of expertise and perspectives is applied to each protocol, ultimately promoting animal welfare and compliance with legal standards.

Designated review, on the other hand, allows for a subset of IACUC members to review certain applications, typically those considered to pose minimal risk. This method streamlines the review process, enabling the committee to allocate resources more effectively while still adhering to regulatory requirements.

Together, these two methods are recognized across both the USDA and PHS guidelines, reflecting their importance in maintaining rigorous oversight of animal research while allowing for efficiency where appropriate. The other options do not align with the established terminology and processes outlined in these policies.