What are the two IACUC review methods recognized by the USDA Animal Welfare Act Regulations and PHS Policy?

The correct response identifies the two review methods as full committee review and designated review. In the context of the USDA Animal Welfare Act Regulations and PHS Policy, these methods serve specific purposes in ensuring ethical and regulatory compliance in animal research.

A full committee review involves the entire Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) examining a proposed research project. This comprehensive review allows for detailed discussion on the ethical considerations, welfare implications for the animals involved, and overall study design to ensure adherence to necessary guidelines and regulations.

Designated review, on the other hand, enables a smaller subset of the IACUC to review certain types of research protocols that may not require full committee evaluation. This method is particularly useful for studies that present minimal risks or involve modifications to previously approved protocols, thereby streamlining the review process without compromising animal welfare standards.

Understanding these methods is crucial for professionals involved in IACUC administration, as it informs how proposals are evaluated and facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements for animal research.