What is the initial process for designated-member review of new submissions?

The initial process for designated-member review of new submissions involves the distribution of protocols to the members of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). In this context, members receive a list of protocols that they are expected to review. This allows them to evaluate the submissions thoroughly and make informed decisions regarding the welfare of animals involved in research.

The option specifying that the Full Committee Review (FCR) can be called by any member underscores the flexibility and accountability of the review process. If any member believes that a protocol requires more extensive discussion or raises particular ethical concerns, they have the authority to call for a full committee meeting. This approach ensures that all submissions receive adequate scrutiny and fosters collaborative decision-making.

In contrast, automatic approval of every protocol would undermine the review process and could compromise animal welfare by not allowing for critical evaluation of research practices. Immediate voting without proper review would not allow members to assess the details necessary for informed consent. Lastly, random selection of protocols would prevent thorough scrutiny of each unique submission, and would not align with best practices for ensuring ethical research conduct.