What is the proper protocol for designated reviews by the IACUC?

The proper protocol for designated reviews by the IACUC is indeed that full committee review is never requested for designated reviews. Designated reviews are intended for specific types of proposals that do not require the oversight of the entire committee, thus streamlining the process for research that poses minimal risk to animal subjects.

In scenarios where designated reviewers are employed, the review is conducted by a subset of the IACUC, typically appointed based on their expertise or familiarity with the proposal. This approach allows for timely review while ensuring appropriate scrutiny, particularly for research that may not necessitate a full committee meeting. As such, it is understood that if a designated reviewer finds the proposal needs further consideration or raises substantial concerns, the full IACUC committee can be called to review the matter.

Other options suggest practices that do not align with the established procedures for designated reviews. For example, requiring that materials go to all IACUC members contradicts the very nature of a designated review, which is meant to operate with a smaller, more agile group. Similarly, the notion that designated reviewers always review in person overlooks the flexibility of conducting reviews through various means, including remote or virtual meetings. Furthermore, the assertion of the chairperson assigning reviewers after a quorum is reached misinterpre