What is the proper sequence for a designated member review by the IACUC?

The proper sequence for a designated member review by the IACUC is based on ensuring that all necessary materials are appropriately distributed, and that there is an organized and efficient method for assessing proposals.

Starting with the correct answer, materials sent to all voting members followed by the chair assigning designated reviewers sets a strong foundation. This process ensures that all IACUC members have access to the proposal details and can be in a position to understand the context and implications fully. By allowing the chair to assign designated reviewers, the process ensures that reviewers with appropriate expertise can evaluate the specific aspects of the proposal effectively. This model fosters attention to the nuances of the proposal and aligns with best practices in IACUC procedures.

In contrast, sending materials only to a quorum of designated reviewers or multiple voting members, without the initial broad engagement, can limit the scope of input and oversight potentially critical for ethical evaluation. Quorum matters, but initiating the review with all members involved helps to democratize the process, enhancing transparency and accountability.

When assessing the sequence, it becomes clear that starting with all members receiving the proposal establishes a more robust and inclusive decision-making mechanism. Providing this foundational review before any decisions or assignments are made is essential to uphold the ethical standards set by IACUC