What should be avoided in the colloquial use of terms related to IACUC reviews?

Using the term "expedited review" interchangeably with other review methods should be avoided because it can lead to significant misunderstandings regarding the nature and process of IACUC reviews. An expedited review has specific criteria and a defined procedure that differentiates it from standard or full committee reviews. When researchers or staff use this term loosely, it can create confusion about the actual requirements and expectations of the review process, potentially impacting compliance with federal regulations and institutional policies.

Inaccurate terminology can affect communication between researchers and the IACUC, leading to improper submissions or mishandling of protocols. Accurate and precise language is essential in maintaining clarity and ensuring that all parties involved fully understand the review processes and their respective implications. This clarity is vital not only for adhering to IACUC standards but also for fostering a professional environment that supports ethical research practices.