Which of the following statements is true regarding IACUC's triennial review of animal activities?

The statement regarding IACUC's triennial review of animal activities that is true is tied to the Public Health Service (PHS) Policy, which does require that institutions have an IACUC that conducts a review of animal protocols at least every three years. As part of this review, the IACUC evaluates existing protocols and, as needed, mandates that investigators submit new protocol forms to ensure that all research aligns with current standards of animal welfare and scientific necessity.

The PHS Policy requires continuous oversight, which includes this triennial review process. When a review is conducted, it serves to reaffirm that the animal research activities are still justified, humane, and compliant with regulations, thereby holding investigators accountable for upholding the highest ethical standards.

In contrast, the other statements present misunderstandings of the IACUC process. A completed waiver would not exempt an institution from review; rather, it may further complicate the oversight process. Additionally, if work ends before the three-year mark, it still does not negate the need for review of any ongoing activities until they are officially concluded or until the agreed timeline has elapsed. Finally, while ongoing grants can influence certain timelines for review or submissions, they do not provide grounds for postponement of the