Which procedure is correctly associated with Designated Member Review?

The procedure correctly associated with Designated Member Review focuses on the role of the IACUC Chair in appointing a single member to conduct the review. This mechanism allows for a more efficient process when a full committee review is not feasible, as it streamlines the evaluation of certain types of research proposals or amendments.

This appointment is crucial as it ensures that the review is carried out by an individual who possesses the expertise and knowledge necessary to evaluate the specific aspects of the proposal in question. Having a designated member helps maintain the integrity and timeliness of the review process, particularly for matters that may not require the full input of all IACUC members.

In contrast, other options misinterpret the functions of designated member review. For instance, while designated members do have authority to approve modifications, they typically do not have the power to disapprove proposals without the consensus of the entire committee in a full review setting. Moreover, the process does not involve gathering votes from all members for tallying because the designated member acts independently in reviewing and making recommendations. Lastly, while urgency may factor into decisions regarding the use of designated member reviews, it's not the primary function of this review process. The key purpose is to facilitate efficient and timely review while still adhering to regulatory and ethical