Which statement about IACUC suspensions of animal activities is false?

The statement that the Institutional Official (IO) must convene an advisory committee to decide on reporting is not accurate in the context of IACUC suspensions. When the IACUC decides to suspend animal activities due to concerns about compliance, animal welfare, or violation of protocols, the IO is obligated to report the suspension to regulatory authorities, such as the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), but this does not involve the convening of an advisory committee.

The other options present correct procedures regarding IACUC suspensions. The Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare indeed perceives a suspension as a permanent interruption because it indicates serious compliance issues that must be addressed before resuming activities. Additionally, the IO's duty to report to regulatory authorities is a crucial aspect of maintaining oversight and accountability in animal care. Furthermore, the ability of the IACUC to suspend activities following a majority vote reflects the committee's fundamental authority and responsibility in ensuring compliance with ethical standards in animal research. Thus, option C stands out as the false statement in this context.