Which statement about the CEO and IO is FALSE?

The statement that the CEO must also serve as the Institutional Official (IO) is indeed false. In many organizational structures, the CEO and IO may be separate roles. While it is possible for the CEO to take on the responsibilities of the IO, it is not a requirement. The IO is responsible for ensuring that the institution complies with regulations concerning animal care and use, which can be an entirely different function from the broader leadership responsibilities of a CEO.

In terms of organizational flexibility, the CEO has the authority to appoint another individual as the IO, thereby allowing for specialization in compliance and oversight of animal research activities. This arrangement can enhance the institution's ability to fulfill its ethical obligations and regulatory compliance, reflecting a common practice within many institutions.

Additionally, the CEO is empowered to delegate authority regarding the appointment of IACUC members. This delegation allows the institution to ensure that members are selected based on their expertise and contributions to animal welfare and ethical research practices, even if the CEO does not personally appoint every member.

Furthermore, the statement that the CEO may or may not be the IO aligns with the flexibility inherent in institutional governance, thereby reinforcing that these roles can be distinct and assigned accordingly. This level of separation helps organizations function more effectively in adhering to regulatory standards