Which statement about the responsibilities of the Institutional Official (IO) is incorrect?

The Institutional Official (IO) has a critical role in overseeing animal care and use programs in research institutions. Among the responsibilities of the IO, one key aspect is that the IO cannot unilaterally reinstate activities that the IACUC has suspended. The IACUC operates independently to ensure compliance with ethical standards and regulations, and any decisions made regarding the approval or suspension of research activities reflect thorough deliberation and oversight by the committee.

When the IACUC suspends a protocol, it does so based on significant concerns that require attention, and therefore, the authority to reinstate those activities rests with the IACUC rather than the IO. This system of checks and balances exists to maintain the integrity of the ethical review process and safeguard the welfare of the animals involved.

In contrast, the other statements regarding the responsibilities of the IO are correct. The IO is indeed responsible for committing institutional resources to ensure compliance with IACUC regulations, can delegate authority in writing to others within the institution, and does not retain rights over previous IACUC approvals once a protocol has been suspended. Each of these points aligns with the established rules governing the roles of the IO in research settings.