Which statement accurately reflects the definition of expedited review within the context of IACUC?

The statement that accurately reflects the definition of expedited review within the context of IACUC is that it is mistakenly viewed as the same as designated review. Expedited review is a specific process used by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) to evaluate certain types of research protocols that involve minimal risk to animal welfare. However, there are many misunderstandings about this process, including equating it with designated review. Designated review is a distinct process involving a subset of IACUC members responsible for reviewing protocols that may require a more focused or in-depth evaluation.

Expedited review applies to a range of studies that meet specific criteria determining them as minimal risk. Therefore, while the expedited review process is an official method recognized by IACUCs, it does not have the same implications or criteria as designated review. It is also not confined to non-complex protocols—complex protocols can sometimes qualify for expedited review if they pose minimal risk. Similarly, expedited review is not a process reserved strictly for emergency studies, but rather for those that can be reviewed efficiently without a full committee meeting. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate interpretation of IACUC processes.