Which statement regarding IACUC suspensions is false?

The statement indicating that the Institutional Official (IO) must invite an advisory committee to discuss reporting to regulatory authorities is not accurate. In the context of IACUC operations, the IO typically has the responsibility of making decisions regarding reporting obligations and handling such discussions independently, rather than being mandated to involve an external advisory committee.

In contrast, the other statements are accurate representations of IACUC protocols. A suspension is indeed defined by OLAW as an interruption of an activity by the IACUC, emphasizing the role of the committee in ensuring animal welfare and compliance. Furthermore, once a suspension occurs, it is a requirement for the IACUC to report this action to the IO, ensuring transparency and keeping institutional leadership informed. Additionally, the requirement for a majority vote at a convened meeting to effect a suspension underscores the democratic process within the IACUC’s decision-making framework, demonstrating that significant decisions regarding research ethics are taken seriously and involve sufficient consensus among committee members.