Which statement regarding the responsibilities of the Institutional Official (IO) is false?

The assertion that the Institutional Official (IO) may reinstate a suspended animal activity is inaccurate. The IO has vital responsibilities concerning the oversight of animal care and use policies, and part of this role includes ensuring that the institution complies with relevant federal regulations and ethical standards regarding animal welfare.

When an animal activity is suspended, it typically occurs due to serious concerns about compliance with IACUC-approved protocols, animal welfare standards, or institutional policies. The reinstatement of such activities usually requires a thorough assessment and approval by the IACUC to ensure that all concerns are addressed and that compliance is restored. Therefore, it is not the IO's prerogative to unilaterally reinstate a suspended activity without following proper procedures and obtaining the necessary approvals from the IACUC.

In contrast, the other statements regarding the responsibilities of the IO reflect true characteristics of the role. The IO must indeed have authority to allocate institutional resources effectively to support animal research and care. While the IO does not need to be the Chief Executive Officer, they typically hold a high-ranking position within the institution to ensure effective governance of research activities involving animals. Moreover, the IO has the power to suspend an already approved animal activity if there are pressing concerns about animal welfare or compliance with regulations