Who decides if a deficiency is classified as significant or minor?

The classification of a deficiency as significant or minor is a collaborative decision made between the IACUC and the Institutional Official. This decision-making process is essential because it ensures that both the scientific and ethical considerations are addressed appropriately. The IACUC is responsible for overseeing the care and use of animals in research, ensuring compliance with regulations and guidelines, while the Institutional Official represents the institution and holds the ultimate responsibility for the institution's compliance.

By working together, the IACUC and the Institutional Official can evaluate the severity of the deficiency in context with the institution's policies and federal regulations. This joint approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of the deficiency on animal welfare, research integrity, and institutional responsibility.

In contrast, the other involved parties such as just the IACUC, the veterinarian, or a funding agency do not possess the same authority or perspective to determine the classification of deficiencies independently, as they lack the combined insight of both regulatory oversight and institutional accountability.